Nellie’s lawyer has hit again at police who arrested the rapper this week for drug possession, claiming their ways had been “overzealous.”
Nellie’s lawyer claims police had no possible trigger to go looking rapper
Nellie’s lawyer, Scott Rosenblum, launched a press release to police after he was arrested on Wednesday (August 7) for possessing ecstasy capsules and having no proof of insurance coverage. additional giant About what occurred earlier than the rapper was detained. In keeping with Rosenblum, Nellie (born Cornell Haynes Jr.) was focused by an “overzealous” and “unruly” police officer.
Rosenblum revealed that regardless of her arrest, Nellie was not charged with drug possession. Moreover, the proof of no insurance coverage expenses stemmed from a search warrant issued final yr and associated to the 2018 incident.
Nellie received a number of jackpots at a on line casino yesterday and was allegedly focused by an officer who “felt pressured to conduct pointless warrant checks” as an alternative of monitoring Midwest MC’s winnings, the assertion stated.
The Missouri State Freeway Patrol trooper is accused of looking Nellie with out possible trigger. Rosenblum questions the effectiveness of the capsules discovered on Rhythm.
“The officer subsequently performed a search with out possible trigger and claimed to have found alleged ‘ecstasy capsules’ on Mr. Haynes’ private property,” the assertion learn.
Nelly was taken into custody by the Missouri State Freeway Patrol and brought to the Maryland Heights Police Division round 4:45 a.m. the place he was arrested and launched.
See beneath for Nellie’s assertion relating to her arrest.
“Mr. Haynes was not charged with drug possession. He was arrested for ‘no proof of insurance coverage’ from 2018 and a warrant was issued for his arrest in December 2023, however he acquired no notification.
Mr. Haynes was focused by an overzealous and unruly police officer. After successful a number of jackpots at a venue that Mr. Haynes often visited and entertained in its amphitheater; the officer not solely oversaw the switch of Mr. Haynes’ winnings but additionally felt the necessity to conduct pointless search warrant inspections. The officer informed Mr. Haynes that background checks had been obligatory when gamers received a certain quantity; Mr. Haynes knew this to be unfaithful as a result of he had received a number of jackpots of comparable or bigger quantities, together with Per week in the past with none incident or background test. When Mr. Haynes was knowledgeable of the warrant for his arrest with out proof of insurance coverage violation, the officer felt compelled to tie Mr. Haynes behind his again and lead him by the on line casino in entrance of different patrons.
The officer then performed a search with out possible trigger and claimed to have discovered so-called “ecstasy capsules” on Mr Haines’ private property.
In an analogous scenario, assuming there was an previous search warrant, no discover, no proof of insurance coverage, another citizen would have been informed to deal with the problem and allowed to maneuver on.
It is usually vital to notice that as a part of worldwide journey necessities, Mr. Haynes is often requested to offer proof of the absence of a search warrant. Together with an FBI inspection. No.
I’m 100% assured that there can be no end result on this case. We are going to demand an investigation into the officer’s actions.
