R. Kelly The U.S. Supreme Court docket requested that his convictions for possessing baby pornography and inducing intercourse from a minor be thrown out, arguing that the conduct he was accused of occurred many years in the past and subsequently the costs have been exterior the statute of limitations.
Right here’s the factor… When R. Kelly was charged in 2020 with possessing baby pornography and having intercourse with an underage lady again within the mid-to-late Nineties, he argued that the statute of limitations had run out.
Nevertheless, prosecutors argue {that a} 2003 regulation, referred to as the PROTECT Act, makes the statute of limitations for baby intercourse crimes indefinite.
Mainly, Kelly’s attorneys Jennifer BonjeanIt argued that as a result of the conduct for which Kelly is presently serving time occurred within the Nineties however the PROTECT Act was not handed till 2003, the Act’s expanded statute of limitations didn’t apply to the costs in opposition to him.
The PROTECT Act indefinitely prolonged the statute of limitations for alleged crimes dedicated after the regulation got here into impact in 2003, however Congress particularly didn’t embrace a provision that might have allowed the regulation to use to alleged conduct dedicated earlier than 2003.
Chances are you’ll recall that Kelly was discovered responsible on six of 13 counts in 2020, three of which concerned baby pornography and three of which concerned solicitation.
August 2023
TMZ.com
He was sentenced to twenty years in jail and ordered to pay tons of of 1000’s of {dollars} in restitution to his alleged victims.
The Supreme Court docket will resolve within the coming months whether or not to listen to Kelly’s attraction.
